🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, threatening phone calls persisted. At first, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, later from the police themselves. In the end, one resident claims he was ordered to the local precinct and told clearly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

This third-generation resident is one of many resisting a expensive redevelopment plan where one of India's largest slums – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be demolished and modernized by a large business group.

"The culture of Dharavi is exceptional in the planet," says Shaikh. "But they want to eradicate our way of life and prevent our protests."

Dual Worlds

The dank gullies of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that overshadow the area. Residences are built haphazardly and often without proper sanitation, unregulated industries emit toxic smoke and the environment is permeated by the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the vision of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and apartments with proper sanitation is an optimistic future achieved.

"We lack sufficient health services, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for youth to recreate," says a tea vendor, fifty-six, who moved from his home state in 1982. "The only way is to tear it all down and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, including Shaikh, are fighting against the plan.

All recognize that the slum, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring investment and development. Yet they are concerned that this plan – lacking resident participation – might transform premium city property into a luxury development, evicting the lower-caste, working-class residents who have lived there since the nineteenth century.

These were these shunned, relocated individuals who established the uninhabited area into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose economic value is estimated at between one million dollars and $2m a year, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Out of about a million inhabitants living in the crowded 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, less than 50% will be qualified for replacement housing in the development, which is estimated to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Others will be moved to barren areas and salt plains on the distant periphery of the metropolis, risking divide a long-established community. Certain individuals will be denied housing at all.

People eligible to remain in Dharavi will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, communal way of living and working that has maintained the community for so long.

Businesses from clothing production to pottery and material recovery are likely to shrink in number and be transferred to a designated "business area" far from residential areas.

Existential Threat

In the case of the leather artisan, a workshop owner and third generation resident to live in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His makeshift, three-storey workshop produces garments – sharp blazers, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and internationally.

Relatives resides in the rooms underneath and employees and sewers – migrants from north India – reside there, allowing him to manage costs. Away from the slum, housing costs are typically significantly as high for a single room.

Threats and Warning

Within the official facilities close by, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project illustrates a contrasting perspective. Slickly dressed inhabitants gather on cycles and e-vehicles, purchasing western-style bread and pastries and enlisting beverages on a patio near Dharavi Cafe and dessert parlor. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains the neighborhood.

"This represents no improvement for our community," states the protester. "This constitutes a massive real estate deal that will render it impossible for our community to continue."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the corporate group. Managed by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and a supporter of the national leader – the business group has encountered allegations of favoritism and questionable practices, which it rejects.

While administrative bodies labels it a collaborative effort, the business group invested $950m for its 80% stake. A case stating that the redevelopment was improperly granted to the corporation is under review in India's supreme court.

Sustained Harassment

After they started to actively protest the project, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been subjected to an extended period of coercion and warning – involving messages, explicit warnings and implications that speaking against the development was equivalent to speaking against the country – by figures they claim represent the corporate group.

Among those suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c